someuser
05-23 03:15 PM
Hi,
Could one of the lawyers/expert please provide their opinion on my situation?
In 2004, my H1B extension was denied and later on approved in Nunc Pro Tunc. The nunc pro tunc process took a total of 64 days and when approved my I-94 was NOT back dated. Hence, I do not have I-94 for 64 days. Later on in July 2007, I filed for my I485.
Since my approval, I have not traveled outside the country and I am currently on EAD based on my pending 485.
The question I have, it's bothering me a lot, Will the gap in I94 for 64 days cause any problems in my I485 approval?
Please advise.
-
Could one of the lawyers/expert please provide their opinion on my situation?
In 2004, my H1B extension was denied and later on approved in Nunc Pro Tunc. The nunc pro tunc process took a total of 64 days and when approved my I-94 was NOT back dated. Hence, I do not have I-94 for 64 days. Later on in July 2007, I filed for my I485.
Since my approval, I have not traveled outside the country and I am currently on EAD based on my pending 485.
The question I have, it's bothering me a lot, Will the gap in I94 for 64 days cause any problems in my I485 approval?
Please advise.
-
wallpaper Beowulf Stills
Blog Feeds
12-30 12:20 PM
Like most of you, I have been following the case of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the 23-year old Nigerian man who attempted to ignite a bomb on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit. As facts begin to emerge, we can now start to discuss the immigration issues that arise in the case. There seem to be more questions than answers at this point and no doubt Department of Homeland Security and Department of State officials are reviewing how Mr. Abdulmutallab was able to fly to the United States. Here are some initial questions. 1.In May 2009, Abdulmutallab's UK visa was revoked...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/christmas-plane-bomber-case-raises-concerns-regarding-visitor-screening.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/christmas-plane-bomber-case-raises-concerns-regarding-visitor-screening.html)
hkhr
06-19 02:00 PM
i am in similar situation, anyone?
2011 Angelina Jolie) was nice.
Blog Feeds
04-07 11:20 AM
Our friendly anti Jack has provided in the comments a couple of links to an intriguing story regarding Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele (currently embroiled in another scandal - this time involving strippers and GOP money - oy!). Steele has been one of the moderate voices in the GOP when it comes to immigration reform in the past and apparently he met with a pro-reform group called the Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM). Accounts differ regarding whether Steele promised to work for immigration reform and, more specifically, help round up a second GOP Senator to sponsor the reform bill...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/gop-head-sort-of-promises-to-support-cir.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/gop-head-sort-of-promises-to-support-cir.html)
more...
waitin_toolong
02-02 09:33 PM
you cannot book H category and b category appts ogather.
Your parents will have to appear for dift interview, though the day can be same as well as time.
Your parents will have to appear for dift interview, though the day can be same as well as time.
Blog Feeds
04-23 11:40 AM
I am happy to write that today I received my first emailed receipt notice for a FY 2010 H-1B application and that then, about 5 hours later, I received an emailed approval notice in the same case. The I-129 was a U.S. Masters Cap case that was premiumed processed with the Vermont Service Center.
I will update this site as I receive word on my other FY 2010 H-1B cap cases.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/04/h1b_approval_notice_for_fy_201.html)
I will update this site as I receive word on my other FY 2010 H-1B cap cases.
More... (http://www.philadelphiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/04/h1b_approval_notice_for_fy_201.html)
more...
ash27
07-17 07:47 PM
When I was on F1, I was able to get my EAD by going to USCIS office. Not sure if we can do the same thing after filing I-485
2010 Jolie On Beowulf
eager_immi
07-18 11:08 AM
send them the business week article. In my company along with me 4 other folks also affected due to visa bulletin mess. I sent them an email on July 9th 2007 about flower campaign organized by IV to USCIS director. The sad part is no body showed any interest and bothered to reply. They are also going to benefited by this decision. These people still beleive in Murthy and other lawyer firm updates. I really don't know how to make these folks interested in IV. Any ideas or other personal stories.
more...
roseball
11-16 12:23 AM
Shouldnt be an issue as GC can be for a future job.....For H1 stamping, your current job requirements and title should be same as the requirements/title on your H1 petition/LCA....
hair Beowulf Movie Poster
franklin
08-13 02:12 AM
Me too
AP approved on 6/13, LUD on 8/12 (a Sunday)
I assume to was a system update only and nothing more than that
There a re quite a few other affected in the same way http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4856&page=151
AP approved on 6/13, LUD on 8/12 (a Sunday)
I assume to was a system update only and nothing more than that
There a re quite a few other affected in the same way http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4856&page=151
more...
connect0123
04-05 01:00 AM
Nice Design!
Keep it up.
U can also take more information by visit our site
Keep it up.
U can also take more information by visit our site
hot Beowulf in Legos: Probably
sagittarian
04-17 04:11 PM
Folks,
I have a break period of 4.5 months. May 15 - Oct 1st. I was wondering if its OK if I just take a course in fall or should I enroll for summer as well. My grace period will end Jul 15th but by that time I should have an I-20 with me for Fall. Is that fine?
Please advise,
Thanks!
I have a break period of 4.5 months. May 15 - Oct 1st. I was wondering if its OK if I just take a course in fall or should I enroll for summer as well. My grace period will end Jul 15th but by that time I should have an I-20 with me for Fall. Is that fine?
Please advise,
Thanks!
more...
house Angelina Jolie promoting
MyUSVisa
05-14 01:04 AM
I joined company ABC on H1B in 2005.
In Nov 2006 company XYZ filed my GC.
H1B got transferred to a couple of companies because I changed jobs while GC was being processed in parallel without being affected by my job changes because it was filed by another company.
In Oct 2007 got my EAD for a period of 1 year. Kept working on H1B only though.
EAD expired in Oct 2008. Applied for a new card but never received it. Did not apply for one after that.
In Nov 2009, I quit my job and moved back to home country giving up my H1B while still not affecting my GC because company XYZ agreed to keep it under process.
So at this time, I have no H1B and no EAD card. My priority date is however going to be current soon.
Now...
1) Do I have to be in the country before my dates get current or can I do that later?
2) On what status do I enter?
3) Can I delay the process somehow without affecting my GC?
In Nov 2006 company XYZ filed my GC.
H1B got transferred to a couple of companies because I changed jobs while GC was being processed in parallel without being affected by my job changes because it was filed by another company.
In Oct 2007 got my EAD for a period of 1 year. Kept working on H1B only though.
EAD expired in Oct 2008. Applied for a new card but never received it. Did not apply for one after that.
In Nov 2009, I quit my job and moved back to home country giving up my H1B while still not affecting my GC because company XYZ agreed to keep it under process.
So at this time, I have no H1B and no EAD card. My priority date is however going to be current soon.
Now...
1) Do I have to be in the country before my dates get current or can I do that later?
2) On what status do I enter?
3) Can I delay the process somehow without affecting my GC?
tattoo Movie Review » BEOWULF by
.jpg "Her animated film, quot;Kung Fu")
arunmohan
12-27 05:46 PM
can a person on H1B do two jobs?e.g one full time and one part time.please give advice, thanks in advance.
more...
pictures Angelina Jolie at event of
krithi
02-07 07:45 AM
Did anyone fly American from Delhi to Chicago using AP, if so can you please share your experience?
Thanks,
Krithi
Thanks,
Krithi
dresses Beowulf - Blu-ray Angelina
muni_k
07-21 11:48 AM
My employer(hospital)filed for the PERM processing and paid the fees for it.It was subsequently approved with an audit.I filed for the I-140 in May 2008.The lawyer who was recommended by the employer did not give me the receipt number,nor the receipt.I was just told that it is pending approval.What are other people's experiences do you usually get a copy of the receipt?I was expecting to get it as I paid for the I-140 filing?I just want it so that I can keep tracking it on the uscis website.
Thanks.
Thanks.
more...
makeup Angelina Jolie - Dance Dance
senthil
01-12 03:48 PM
saves time runnin around usps / fedex
girlfriend Her animated film, quot;Kung Fu
Juelz
08-02 09:08 AM
wasn't this finished like ages ago? :huh:
hairstyles Angelina Jolie as Grendel#39;s
Macaca
10-30 08:54 PM
Honey, They Shrunk the Congress (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/opinion/30tues4.html) By ADAM COHEN | New York Times, October 30, 2007
President Bush�s nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, was asked an important question about Congress�s power at his confirmation hearing. If witnesses claim executive privilege and refuse to respond to Congressional subpoenas in the United States attorneys scandal � as Karl Rove and Harriet Miers have done � and Congress holds them in contempt, would his Justice Department refer the matter to a grand jury for criminal prosecution, as federal law requires?
Mr. Mukasey suggested the answer would be no. That was hardly his only slap-down of Congress. He made the startling claim that a president can defy laws if he or she is acting within the authority �to defend the country.� That is a mighty large exception to the rule that Congress�s laws are supreme.
The founders wanted the �people�s branch� to be strong, but the Bush administration has usurped a frightening number of Congress�s powers � with very little resistance. The question is whether members of Congress of both parties will do anything about it.
Congress is often described as one of three coequal branches, but that is not entirely true. As Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale law professor, observed in �America�s Constitution: a Biography,� Article I actually makes Congress �first among equals, with wide power to structure the second-mentioned executive and third-mentioned judicial branches.�
Article I, which describes Congress�s powers, is the Constitution�s first, longest and most generously worded article. It gives Congress a wide array of specific powers, but also broad authority to pass laws that bring to life �all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.�
It would be hard to recognize that powerful Congress today. In part, that is because Congress has been unwilling or unable to enact laws on the most important issues facing the nation � Iraq, immigration reform, health care.
Just as troubling, though, is how it has allowed its institutional power to erode. President Bush has regularly issued signing statements � including on critical issues like the ban on torture � that assert his right to ignore new laws at the same time as he signs them. These signing statements are not just talk. A report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office states that in nearly one-third of the cases it looked at, after President Bush issued a signing statement objecting to a provision of a new law, his administration did not implement it as written.
The Senate has routinely confirmed judicial nominees who make no secret of their belief that the president�s power should be sweeping, and Congress�s sharply cut back.
The Senate confirmed Jeffrey Sutton to a federal appeals court judgeship even though Patrick Leahy, now the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, observed that as a lawyer Mr. Sutton �aggressively sought out cases to limit the power of Congress to enact laws protecting individual rights.� It confirmed Janice Rogers Brown to the powerful United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit even though she had suggested that much of the legislation passed during the New Deal � including the Social Security Act � was unconstitutional.
There are things Congress can do. It can start by speaking out about the importance of Congressional power the way the administration has talked about deferring to the commander in chief. Congress should pass laws that support its own power � like a bipartisan one that Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, has introduced to nullify the impact of signing statements.
The Senate should refuse to confirm nominees who do not take Congressional power seriously. And Congress should make clear that if the executive branch will not enforce its subpoenas, it will use its own �inherent contempt� powers to do so.
Right now, standing up for Congress may appeal more to Democrats than Republicans. The issue of reining in presidential power is beginning to gain traction among conservatives, however, as they contemplate the possibility of a Democrat � particularly Hillary Clinton � as president.
Defending Congressional authority should not be a partisan issue. The founders wanted a strong Congress because they understood the importance of ensuring that the most democratic branch have a strong say in how the nation is run.
President Bush�s nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, was asked an important question about Congress�s power at his confirmation hearing. If witnesses claim executive privilege and refuse to respond to Congressional subpoenas in the United States attorneys scandal � as Karl Rove and Harriet Miers have done � and Congress holds them in contempt, would his Justice Department refer the matter to a grand jury for criminal prosecution, as federal law requires?
Mr. Mukasey suggested the answer would be no. That was hardly his only slap-down of Congress. He made the startling claim that a president can defy laws if he or she is acting within the authority �to defend the country.� That is a mighty large exception to the rule that Congress�s laws are supreme.
The founders wanted the �people�s branch� to be strong, but the Bush administration has usurped a frightening number of Congress�s powers � with very little resistance. The question is whether members of Congress of both parties will do anything about it.
Congress is often described as one of three coequal branches, but that is not entirely true. As Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale law professor, observed in �America�s Constitution: a Biography,� Article I actually makes Congress �first among equals, with wide power to structure the second-mentioned executive and third-mentioned judicial branches.�
Article I, which describes Congress�s powers, is the Constitution�s first, longest and most generously worded article. It gives Congress a wide array of specific powers, but also broad authority to pass laws that bring to life �all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.�
It would be hard to recognize that powerful Congress today. In part, that is because Congress has been unwilling or unable to enact laws on the most important issues facing the nation � Iraq, immigration reform, health care.
Just as troubling, though, is how it has allowed its institutional power to erode. President Bush has regularly issued signing statements � including on critical issues like the ban on torture � that assert his right to ignore new laws at the same time as he signs them. These signing statements are not just talk. A report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office states that in nearly one-third of the cases it looked at, after President Bush issued a signing statement objecting to a provision of a new law, his administration did not implement it as written.
The Senate has routinely confirmed judicial nominees who make no secret of their belief that the president�s power should be sweeping, and Congress�s sharply cut back.
The Senate confirmed Jeffrey Sutton to a federal appeals court judgeship even though Patrick Leahy, now the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, observed that as a lawyer Mr. Sutton �aggressively sought out cases to limit the power of Congress to enact laws protecting individual rights.� It confirmed Janice Rogers Brown to the powerful United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit even though she had suggested that much of the legislation passed during the New Deal � including the Social Security Act � was unconstitutional.
There are things Congress can do. It can start by speaking out about the importance of Congressional power the way the administration has talked about deferring to the commander in chief. Congress should pass laws that support its own power � like a bipartisan one that Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, has introduced to nullify the impact of signing statements.
The Senate should refuse to confirm nominees who do not take Congressional power seriously. And Congress should make clear that if the executive branch will not enforce its subpoenas, it will use its own �inherent contempt� powers to do so.
Right now, standing up for Congress may appeal more to Democrats than Republicans. The issue of reining in presidential power is beginning to gain traction among conservatives, however, as they contemplate the possibility of a Democrat � particularly Hillary Clinton � as president.
Defending Congressional authority should not be a partisan issue. The founders wanted a strong Congress because they understood the importance of ensuring that the most democratic branch have a strong say in how the nation is run.
drona
09-01 04:19 PM
IV Meet-up in San Diego Sept 2nd at 1 PM. Please join our yahoo group for more info:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SC_Immigration_Voice/
See you then!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SC_Immigration_Voice/
See you then!
gchopes
11-23 09:42 AM
My local congressman got this reply from USCIS on my AP renewal case. Its been over 90 days and pending? Please help with any advice.
---
The processing of this case has been delayed. A check of our records establishes that this case is not yet ready for decision, as the required investigation into the applicant background remains open.
Until the background investigation is completed, we cannot move forward on this case. These background checks are required to be completed on all applicants who apply for the immigration benefit they are seeking. We will make every effort to make a decision on this case as soon as the background checks are complete.
Thank you for your inquiry and please do not hesitate to contact us again if you have further questions regarding this case.
---
The processing of this case has been delayed. A check of our records establishes that this case is not yet ready for decision, as the required investigation into the applicant background remains open.
Until the background investigation is completed, we cannot move forward on this case. These background checks are required to be completed on all applicants who apply for the immigration benefit they are seeking. We will make every effort to make a decision on this case as soon as the background checks are complete.
Thank you for your inquiry and please do not hesitate to contact us again if you have further questions regarding this case.
No comments:
Post a Comment